Click here to go to the previous page
Adaptive Licensing: Bane or Boon for Drug Development?
Program Code:
383
Date:
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Time:
3:30 PM to 5:00 PM
EST
CHAIR
:
Before becoming Senior Medical Officer, he was professor and chair of clinical pharmacology and vice-rector at the Medical University of Vienna. Other positions held include President of the Vienna School of Clinical Research. His industry experience includes UK Ciba-Geigy and US Merck & Co
|
PRESENTER
(S):
Dr Lim has been a safety and efficacy reviewer of CNS-related drugs across life cycle for over a decade. More recently, she has been developing the Progessive Licensing Project's benefit-risk and licensing concepts.
|
Kenneth Oye, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), United States
Thomas Unger, Pfizer Inc, United States
Description
Regulatory decisions are of necessity based on incomplete data Traditional drug licensing approaches are based on binary approval decisions which reduce the uncertainty of an experimental therapy to a fully vetted, safe, and efficacious market authorization. Adaptive licensing (AL) proposals would contrast this precedent providing iterative phases of data gathering followed by regulatory evaluation and would allow the approval process to align more closely with patient needs such as timely access to new technology and the information required to inform medical decisions. Adaptive licensing would build on and broaden existing elements of drug regulation, including accelerated approval (in US) or conditional marketing authorization (in EU). This session summarizes a number of recent AL proposals and discusses how AL might be translated into practice.
Learning Objectives:
Discuss current proposals in this field and how these relate to different stakeholders' interests
Recognize the opportunities and challenges that need to be addressed before adaptive licensing pathways can be translated into practice.